The fresh new Metacognition Questionnaire is an excellent 65-items measure always assess the philosophy individuals have regarding their considering
It consists of five facts: confident care philosophy (“Alarming assists me to prevent dilemmas later on”), beliefs regarding the uncontrollability and you will chances (“My personal alarming was dangerous for me personally”), cognitive skills (“I have little trust in my thoughts to possess words and you can names”), general bad opinions (“Easily didn’t control a distressing imagine, after which it just happened, it would be my blame”), and you can intellectual worry about-consciousness (“I think much on the my personal advice”). Brand new metacognition questionnaire is actually scored inside a beneficial 4 part scale out-of 1 (“do not agree”) to help you 4 (“consent quite”) and had a beneficial Chronbach’s leader = .88. This new metacognition survey has been used generally from inside the low-medical samples such as smokers and you will students [forty two, 45]. An entire rating is actually determined to make a catalog away from metacognition for every single fellow member.
The latest Compulsive-Compulsive Directory is an excellent 42-product mind-declaration survey, assessing the severity of individuals obsessions and you can compulsions from OCD during escort service Richmond the grownups . This new fanatical-compulsive directory consists of 7 subscales that are included with washing (“We clean my give more frequently otherwise more than called for”), examining (“I go back once again to urban centers making sure that We have maybe not harmed someone”), doubting (“Although I really do anything carefully I feel that it isn’t quite correct”), purchasing (“I get disturb in the event that others enjoys altered the way i features arranged my one thing”), obsessing (“I’ve found challenging to control my opinion”), hoarding (“I gather something I don’t need”), and you will neutralising (“Personally i think I want to recite specific wide variety”). That it index is obtained for the a cuatro area Likert size, from (“not really”) so you’re able to 4 (“extremely”) and had good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A total rating is actually calculated to form you to definitely score for every single new member pertaining to O-C attacks.
Chances take to out-of students took part in the analysis. People have been to begin with offered information about the research and you will provided the chance to make inquiries about this. Immediately after giving concur, for every participant offered market recommendations, following was in fact offered this new five surveys inside a beneficial counterbalanced acquisition to resolve at their particular day. In the event the new member finished she or he is actually thanked and you will debriefed. All the content and procedures then followed the ethical direction and procedures outlined from the Western Psychological Organization and you may was in fact checked and you can approved of the College out of Hertfordshire ethics panel (Number:14149216).
Studies was screened to have shed values, outliers and you will assumptions out of statistical study in advance of people data . Every parameters had appropriate viewpoints to possess skewness and you can kurtosis and no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of scores of all computed spiders shown confident and you can high contacts between the two (Table 1). The strongest association is between the indexes away from condition and you can attribute stress, followed closely by the newest relationship ranging from stress awareness, metacognition and you can O-C episodes.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.